Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comparing computers to phones CPU performance

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Roman Krnáč
    replied

    Hi experts, please help me to solve my problem. Sorry for my English, but I'm just a student. In my work I compare the latest line of processors i7 7700k and Snapdragon 835 ---- can be in devices such as Samsung Galasy s7 .... could you please tell me how to get to the same number as you wrote people up here? Or how make PerformanceTest please? THANK YOU - please answer my mail - romankrnac94@gmail.com ---> need not be used as research in their work and I am forbidden to use the forum.

    Leave a comment:


  • igadget
    replied
    Note 4 vs. Intel pentium T2370

    Can you please provide the same data for Galaxy Note 4 (exynos 5433) and Intel pentium T2370, because I had a debate with a computer programmer who claimed that the note 4 is much slower, I know that note 4 is probably faster, but I need to have evidence before I make claims. This would be greatly appreciated, thank you!

    Originally posted by Richard (PassMark) View Post
    As mentioned by "passmark", the CPUMark and Mobile CPUMark values aren't directly comparable. You can roughly compare the performance by comparing the operation / sec, or MB/sec figures of individual tests.

    We don't make the raw numbers available, but you can load baselines within PerformanceTest to see results for a particular baseline.

    The following numbers are averages from PerformanceTest V6 as at 8/Nov/2011:

    Intel Core i7-2920XM
    Integer Test ~2178 MOps/Sec
    Floating Point Test ~2529 MOps/Sec
    Prime Number Test ~1069 Thousand Prime/Sec
    String Sorting ~5291 Thousand Strings/Sec
    Compression ~9375 KBytes/Sec
    Encryption ~26.5 MBytes/Sec

    Intel Core i5-2520M
    Integer Test ~850 MOps/Sec
    Floating Point Test ~1143 MOps/Sec
    Prime Number Test ~659 Thousand Prime/Sec
    String Sorting ~2560 Thousand Strings/Sec
    Compression ~4501 KBytes/Sec
    Encryption ~12.6 MBytes/Sec

    Intel Core2 Duo T7300
    Integer Test ~201 MOps/Sec
    Floating Point Test ~440 MOps/Sec
    Prime Number Test ~351 Thousand Prime/Sec
    String Sorting ~1150 Thousand Strings/Sec
    Compression ~1950 KBytes/Sec
    Encryption ~ 5.6 MBytes/Sec

    Intel Atom N270
    Integer Test ~20.9 MOps/Sec
    Floating Point Test ~92.0 MOps/Sec
    Prime Number Test ~65.8 Thousand Prime/Sec
    String Sorting ~414 Thousand Strings/Sec
    Compression ~696 KBytes/Sec
    Encryption ~2.7 MBytes/Sec

    AMD A8-3850
    Integer Test ~2344 MOps/Sec
    Floating Point Test ~2857 MOps/Sec
    Prime Number Test ~1783 Thousand Prime/Sec
    String Sorting ~2952 Thousand Strings/Sec
    Compression ~4181 KBytes/Sec
    Encryption ~17.8 MBytes/Sec

    AMD Phenom II X4 955
    Integer Test ~582 MOps/Sec
    Floating Point Test ~2989 MOps/Sec
    Prime Number Test ~808 Thousand Prime/Sec
    String Sorting ~3138 Thousand Strings/Sec
    Compression ~4586 KBytes/Sec
    Encryption ~20.0 MBytes/Sec

    AMD C-60
    Integer Test ~103 MOps/Sec
    Floating Point Test ~435 MOps/Sec
    Prime Number Test ~105 Thousand Prime/Sec
    String Sorting ~449 Thousand Strings/Sec
    Compression ~681 KBytes/Sec
    Encryption ~ 2.3 MBytes/Sec

    See next post for results for some phones.

    Leave a comment:


  • BoiseMark
    replied
    Thanks for the research! This is very enlightening. These numbers show the gap between computers and phones. It is huge.

    I compared my old laptop with the fastest phone you list. String, integer, and floating point performance on the phone is roughly half that of the computer (60%, 50%, 48% respectfully) while the prime number and compression performance is a paltry 14% and 18% respectfully.

    We still have a long way to go.

    Thanks again for all your help!

    Have a great evening.

    Leave a comment:


  • Richard (PassMark)
    replied
    The following numbers are averages:

    Samsung Galaxy S II (GT-I9100)
    Integer Test ~100 MOps/Sec
    Floating Point Test ~213 MOps/Sec
    Prime Number Test ~49.6Thousand Prime/Sec
    String Sorting ~694 Thousand Strings/Sec
    Compression ~560 KBytes/Sec
    Encryption ~1.0 MBytes/Sec

    Samsung Galaxy S (GT-I9000)
    Integer Test ~32 MOps/Sec
    Floating Point Test ~40 MOps/Sec
    Prime Number Test ~18.1 Thousand Prime/Sec
    String Sorting ~287 Thousand Strings/Sec
    Compression ~208 KBytes/Sec
    Encryption ~.40 MBytes/Sec

    Motorola Atrix (MB860)
    Integer Test ~69.7 MOps/Sec
    Floating Point Test ~158 MOps/Sec
    Prime Number Test ~41.9 Thousand Prime/Sec
    String Sorting ~588 Thousand Strings/Sec
    Compression ~364 KBytes/Sec
    Encryption ~.70 MBytes/Sec

    HTC DROID Incredible 2
    Integer Test ~30.7 MOps/Sec
    Floating Point Test ~60.2 MOps/Sec
    Prime Number Test ~16.5 Thousand Prime/Sec
    String Sorting ~224 Thousand Strings/Sec
    Compression ~198 KBytes/Sec
    Encryption ~.35 MBytes/Sec

    HTC (T-Mobile) MyTouch3G
    Integer Test ~5.9 MOps/Sec
    Floating Point Test ~2.4 MOps/Sec
    Prime Number Test ~4.1 Thousand Prime/Sec
    String Sorting ~28.3 Thousand Strings/Sec
    Compression ~18.3 KBytes/Sec
    Encryption ~.02 MBytes/Sec

    Leave a comment:


  • Richard (PassMark)
    replied
    As mentioned by David, the CPUMark and Mobile CPUMark values aren't directly comparable. You can roughly compare the performance by comparing the operation / sec, or MB/sec figures of individual tests.

    We don't make the raw numbers available, but you can load baselines within PerformanceTest to see results for a particular baseline.

    The following numbers are averages from PerformanceTest V6 as at 8/Nov/2011:

    Intel Core i7-2920XM
    Integer Test ~2178 MOps/Sec
    Floating Point Test ~2529 MOps/Sec
    Prime Number Test ~1069 Thousand Prime/Sec
    String Sorting ~5291 Thousand Strings/Sec
    Compression ~9375 KBytes/Sec
    Encryption ~26.5 MBytes/Sec

    Intel Core i5-2520M
    Integer Test ~850 MOps/Sec
    Floating Point Test ~1143 MOps/Sec
    Prime Number Test ~659 Thousand Prime/Sec
    String Sorting ~2560 Thousand Strings/Sec
    Compression ~4501 KBytes/Sec
    Encryption ~12.6 MBytes/Sec

    Intel Core2 Duo T7300
    Integer Test ~201 MOps/Sec
    Floating Point Test ~440 MOps/Sec
    Prime Number Test ~351 Thousand Prime/Sec
    String Sorting ~1150 Thousand Strings/Sec
    Compression ~1950 KBytes/Sec
    Encryption ~ 5.6 MBytes/Sec

    Intel Atom N270
    Integer Test ~20.9 MOps/Sec
    Floating Point Test ~92.0 MOps/Sec
    Prime Number Test ~65.8 Thousand Prime/Sec
    String Sorting ~414 Thousand Strings/Sec
    Compression ~696 KBytes/Sec
    Encryption ~2.7 MBytes/Sec

    AMD A8-3850
    Integer Test ~2344 MOps/Sec
    Floating Point Test ~2857 MOps/Sec
    Prime Number Test ~1783 Thousand Prime/Sec
    String Sorting ~2952 Thousand Strings/Sec
    Compression ~4181 KBytes/Sec
    Encryption ~17.8 MBytes/Sec

    AMD Phenom II X4 955
    Integer Test ~582 MOps/Sec
    Floating Point Test ~2989 MOps/Sec
    Prime Number Test ~808 Thousand Prime/Sec
    String Sorting ~3138 Thousand Strings/Sec
    Compression ~4586 KBytes/Sec
    Encryption ~20.0 MBytes/Sec

    AMD C-60
    Integer Test ~103 MOps/Sec
    Floating Point Test ~435 MOps/Sec
    Prime Number Test ~105 Thousand Prime/Sec
    String Sorting ~449 Thousand Strings/Sec
    Compression ~681 KBytes/Sec
    Encryption ~ 2.3 MBytes/Sec

    See next post for results for some phones.

    Leave a comment:


  • BoiseMark
    replied
    Thanks for the info. I was building a table with the following devices ...

    MP/sec / CPU mark / device / processor
    ? / 7,699 / Dell M4600 / I7-2920XM
    ? / 3,821 / Samsung Galaxy S II / Snapdragon S3 APQ8060
    ? / 3,607 / Dell E6420 / i5-2520M
    ? / 3,369 / Dell Streak 7 / Nvidia Tegra 2
    ? / 1,335 / Motorola DroidX / TI OMAP3630-1000
    ? / 1,154 / Dell D630 / T7300

    If you can point me to the raw data, I can do my own digging.

    Leave a comment:


  • David (PassMark)
    replied
    The CPUMark and Mobile CPUMark values aren't directly comparable. The reason being is that the suite of tests isn't the same on each device. For example phones can't do 64bit, and can't do SMID instructions. So it isn't apples to apples.

    What you can roughly compare is the operation / sec, or MB/sec figures of individual tests. But the figures for this aren't in the graphs. You need to look at individual baselines.

    We'll dig out a couple of numbers and post them here.

    Leave a comment:


  • BoiseMark
    started a topic Comparing computers to phones CPU performance

    Comparing computers to phones CPU performance

    First off, this is a great resource. Thank you so much for making this information available.

    In yesterday's discussion with my coworkers about the future of tablets, phones, and computers, the question came up: how does the horsepower in my pocket compare with my 5 year old laptop?

    I came to your site and was happy to see Mobile Devices along with CPU benchmarks. But when I got into the details, I was confused by the column headers. The CPU tables have one column titled "Passmark CPU Mark" while the Mobile Devices has two: "PassMark" and "CPUMark".

    Case in point:
    Intel Core2 Duo T7300 @ 2.00GHz
    • Passmark CPU Mark = 1,154

    Samsung Galaxy S II (GT-I9100G)
    • PassMark = 1,604
    • CPUMark = 3,821

    Is it possible to do a relative compare between the two? Would it be right to say the phone is 39% faster (1604 / 1154) or 3.3 times as fast (3821 / 1154)?

    Please don't take time to explain something that is already documented in a FAQ. All I need is a pointer.

    Thanks for taking time to answer this.

    mark
Working...
X