low results on Memory read- Cached

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • irmis
    Newbie
    • Mar 2007
    • 1

    #1

    low results on Memory read- Cached

    hi, only got 1059 out of 2000 on Memory read - Cached test. Should i be worried?
  • David (PassMark)
    Administrator
    • Jan 2003
    • 11069

    #2
    The test is NOT 'out of'. The 2000 value just happens to be the maximum value on the graph's scale. 2000 is not the maximum value possible for a computer.

    But having said that, 1059 is a low score for a new computer. If it is new.

    Comment

    • ice
      Member
      • Feb 2007
      • 37

      #3
      Originally posted by irmis
      hi, only got 1059 out of 2000 on Memory read - Cached test. Should i be worried?
      Hey Irmis, what are your pc specs??

      I bet you have an AMD Athlon.. don't you? o.O

      Comment

      • ice
        Member
        • Feb 2007
        • 37

        #4
        can anyone please comment on this? i have the same exactly problem

        Please !

        Comment

        • David (PassMark)
          Administrator
          • Jan 2003
          • 11069

          #5
          What is the problem? This is a normal score for many PCs.

          Especially portable PCs or PCs a couple of years old.

          Comment

          • ice
            Member
            • Feb 2007
            • 37

            #6
            Originally posted by passmark
            What is the problem? This is a normal score for many PCs.

            Especially portable PCs or PCs a couple of years old.

            no, i have an athlon 64 x2 4200+, i already posted a thread about it, and nobody really told me why i'm getting such low read cached/uncached results... and once again, is it because of only 512kb x 2 L2 cache?

            thank you in advance

            ice

            Comment

            • David (PassMark)
              Administrator
              • Jan 2003
              • 11069

              #7
              Your result is not low for your hardware. See your previous post.

              Comment

              Working...