Hello there,
I recently purchased a mid-range gaming pc:
AMD Athlon 64 x2 core 4200+
2 GB DDR 400
160 GB SATA / 500 GB Seagate
Here's the sitch:
I ran 6.1 to test out the computer with a
PNY GeForce FX 5200 256MB DDR PCI card. The 3d (and some 2d) tests were horrible. I was getting around 150 for simple 3d, 30 for medium, and 6.8 for complex. Switching to 16 bit color improved the simple 3d slightly
So I dropped in a PCI-E x16 WinFast PX6200 128MB. The difference was amazing. In 16 bit: simple 3d jumped to simple: 489 FPS, medium: 76.9, and Complex 26.1. Switching back to 32 bit dropped these umbers, but still demolished the PNY PCI card.
Now I understand PCI-E is favored over PCI for video interface, but I cannot imagine selling a 256MB GeForce video card that gets less than 7FPS at 800x600x32 is gonna push many units. The question is: am I missing something exclusive to the PCI card, or is it just bottlenecked? Why does the 128MB PCI-E run circles around the PCI 256MB?
Regards,
I recently purchased a mid-range gaming pc:
AMD Athlon 64 x2 core 4200+
2 GB DDR 400
160 GB SATA / 500 GB Seagate
Here's the sitch:
I ran 6.1 to test out the computer with a
PNY GeForce FX 5200 256MB DDR PCI card. The 3d (and some 2d) tests were horrible. I was getting around 150 for simple 3d, 30 for medium, and 6.8 for complex. Switching to 16 bit color improved the simple 3d slightly
So I dropped in a PCI-E x16 WinFast PX6200 128MB. The difference was amazing. In 16 bit: simple 3d jumped to simple: 489 FPS, medium: 76.9, and Complex 26.1. Switching back to 32 bit dropped these umbers, but still demolished the PNY PCI card.
Now I understand PCI-E is favored over PCI for video interface, but I cannot imagine selling a 256MB GeForce video card that gets less than 7FPS at 800x600x32 is gonna push many units. The question is: am I missing something exclusive to the PCI card, or is it just bottlenecked? Why does the 128MB PCI-E run circles around the PCI 256MB?
Regards,
Comment