I am buying a new laptop and having trouble deciding on a processor. Here is a list of processors available:
The laptop will have 8gb of memory and at least a 128gb SSD drive (perhaps even an M.2 PCIe x4 SSD). It will also have a dedicated video card. It needs to be able to run at least 4 monitors (3 external + internal).
I use and have open at any given time the following apps:
Chrome browser (multiple windows and many, many tabs)
Google Drive Sync
Adobe Acrobat Pro (multiple pdf's open at once, often creating, sometimes editing)
OpenOffice (a few documents open)
MSOffice ( a few documents open)
Quickbooks Pro 2014
Windows Explorer (multiple windows)
I also often run a media player or stream music from the internet (Google Play, Pandora, Amazon Prime).
When working I am constantly flipping between monitors and windows, various tabs in Chrome and opening new documents. I will be using a docking station at home and work. It will be used on battery 6-12 times/year and probably only 30 minutes, at most.
I don't like waiting on the computer. Unless I find a really good deal on the 4940mx, I wouldn't consider buying it based on price, tdp, and performance. It simply doesn't outperform the 4910mq sufficiently to warrant the extra cost.
Questions:
1) With this type of use will I experience any real world difference between these processors?
2) Running multiple apps like this, is it better to have 4 cores than 2? I assume that, if background apps are tying up 1 or 2 cores, the foreground app will roll to the next available core, but I'm not sure that is how it works.
3) I know cpu bus speed used to effect the speed of the memory and, iirc, the PCI lanes, so do I need to take that into consideration? I don't want to invest in fast memory and SSD drive only to have them slowed down by going with a cheaper processor.
Thanks in advance for any help,
dk
i7-4940mx |
i7-4910mq |
i7-4810mq |
i7-4710mq |
i7-4610m |
i5-4340m |
i5-4310m |
i5-4210m |
I use and have open at any given time the following apps:
Chrome browser (multiple windows and many, many tabs)
Google Drive Sync
Adobe Acrobat Pro (multiple pdf's open at once, often creating, sometimes editing)
OpenOffice (a few documents open)
MSOffice ( a few documents open)
Quickbooks Pro 2014
Windows Explorer (multiple windows)
I also often run a media player or stream music from the internet (Google Play, Pandora, Amazon Prime).
When working I am constantly flipping between monitors and windows, various tabs in Chrome and opening new documents. I will be using a docking station at home and work. It will be used on battery 6-12 times/year and probably only 30 minutes, at most.
I don't like waiting on the computer. Unless I find a really good deal on the 4940mx, I wouldn't consider buying it based on price, tdp, and performance. It simply doesn't outperform the 4910mq sufficiently to warrant the extra cost.
Questions:
1) With this type of use will I experience any real world difference between these processors?
2) Running multiple apps like this, is it better to have 4 cores than 2? I assume that, if background apps are tying up 1 or 2 cores, the foreground app will roll to the next available core, but I'm not sure that is how it works.
3) I know cpu bus speed used to effect the speed of the memory and, iirc, the PCI lanes, so do I need to take that into consideration? I don't want to invest in fast memory and SSD drive only to have them slowed down by going with a cheaper processor.
Thanks in advance for any help,
dk
Comment