Hi, I think the best way I can illustrate what I mean is by posting a couple of screenshots:
...sooooo...the passmark tests show a massive disparity between read & write rates, whilst the ATTO benchmark shows that they are both pretty similar.
I was just wondering if anyone had any feedback on this, and if there was anything I could do to get passmark to register the correct speed.
Naturally I understand that the passmark test & atto benchmark are two different tests and they would not necessarily produce the same numbers, however it is the massive difference between the read & write speeds (600 MBps) that I don't understand. I would not questions the read rate of passmark showing ~900 MBps, whilst atto showing ~1000 MBps if the write rate of ~250 MBps shown by passmark was closer to the ~950 MBps of atto!!!
Anyway, thanks for taking your time to read this post,
cheers, krs
...sooooo...the passmark tests show a massive disparity between read & write rates, whilst the ATTO benchmark shows that they are both pretty similar.
I was just wondering if anyone had any feedback on this, and if there was anything I could do to get passmark to register the correct speed.
Naturally I understand that the passmark test & atto benchmark are two different tests and they would not necessarily produce the same numbers, however it is the massive difference between the read & write speeds (600 MBps) that I don't understand. I would not questions the read rate of passmark showing ~900 MBps, whilst atto showing ~1000 MBps if the write rate of ~250 MBps shown by passmark was closer to the ~950 MBps of atto!!!
Anyway, thanks for taking your time to read this post,
cheers, krs
Comment