Athlon 64 vs Athlon 64 X2

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JJDubs
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2007
    • 5

    #1

    Athlon 64 vs Athlon 64 X2

    OK. I just replaced an AMD Athlon 64 3400+ with an AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+. My score actually got worse! This is depressing. Anybody got any ideas?

    Asus A8V-VM SE
    AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+
    1G memory (single channel)

    Score: 356.8

    Asus A8V-VM SE
    AMD Athlon 64 3400+
    1G memory (single channel)

    Score: 382.5

    John
  • David (PassMark)
    Administrator
    • Jan 2003
    • 11092

    #2
    Are you using the latest version of PerfomanceTest? Old versions didn't always pick up and use multiple cores.

    Where was the difference? Was it in for example in the CPU results, or Disk results, or somewhere else?

    The single core 3400+ does have a higher clock speed than the Dual core x2 3800+. So it would be expected that the 3400+ outperforms the 3800+ in some single threaded tasks.

    Comment

    • JJDubs
      Junior Member
      • Jul 2007
      • 5

      #3
      Here's an image (gif) of my results. The only change made to the system was the processor.

      Blue=Old processor
      Green=New processor
      Red=My work laptop (Intel 1.8Ghz Dual)

      http://www.jjdubs.com/images/072507.gif

      Comment

      • JJDubs
        Junior Member
        • Jul 2007
        • 5

        #4
        Compared to other systems similar to mine, my CPU results all seem to be 1/2 what they should be.

        Bad processor? Or something not set right?

        John

        Comment

        • David (PassMark)
          Administrator
          • Jan 2003
          • 11092

          #5
          Are you using the latest version of PerfomanceTest? Old versions didn't always pick up and use multiple cores.

          Does the O/S detect 2 CPUs in task manager. Maybe you have the Uniprocessor HAL installed as a result of your old CPU. Or maybe you have XP home, which doesn't support multiple CPUs?

          Comment

          • JJDubs
            Junior Member
            • Jul 2007
            • 5

            #6
            Hmmmm. I changed the number of CPU Test Processes from 1 to 2 then 4 then 10 and finally 64 and lo and behold my results shot up like a rocket. I went from 369 to 506 which seems to be where similar machines rank.

            Comment

            • JJDubs
              Junior Member
              • Jul 2007
              • 5

              #7
              I failed to mention earlier that I also doubled my ram so now I have 2G/Dual Channel mode.

              Comment

              Working...