Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Performance Test - Different Scores between runs

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Yes, they are expensive drives. When you consider their low capacity, they appear extremely expensive on a GB per $ basis.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by passmark View Post
      Yes, they are expensive drives. When you consider their low capacity, they appear extremely expensive on a GB per $ basis.
      Wow you aren't kidding. I never actually looked at the price, but a quick newegg glance:

      16gb ~ $275/300
      128gb ~ $3000!

      Yea... no thank you!
      Intel Q9450
      EVGA 790i Ultra Motherboard
      4gb OCZ DDR3 1600 @ 7-7-7-24
      2 x EVGA 8800GT's KO Edition
      74gb Raptor HDD
      Vista Ultimate x64

      Comment


      • #18
        Raid 0

        Hello!

        If i configure Raid 0, does it get faster to raid 4 discs than 2? This question may be a bit strange..but i have never done a raid-configuration before.

        Comment


        • #19
          If you are doing striping and have a good controller, RAID 5 (with 4 disks or more) should be slightly faster than RAID 0 (with 2 disks).

          Comment


          • #20
            Harddrives

            Then, what wins in the end? 4 seagate barracuda 7200 32 mb sata 2īs raided or a velociraptor? the price is about the same anyway.

            Comment


            • #21
              I thought i had figured things out now...i was going to buy 2x Velociraptor in Raid 0-configuration...Now i found a drive Hitachi Ultrastar Drive 15.000 RPM. I know that itīs more expensive per-gig, but i dont care that much about the difference, i use regular disks for storage.

              So.....

              2 x Velociraptor - 300 GB - Raid 0

              2 x Ultrastar 36 GB - Raid 0

              Comment

              Working...
              X