Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

X2 4400+ @ 2.8 - 893.82

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • X2 4400+ @ 2.8 - 893.82

    CPU - Integer Math 413.68
    CPU - Floating Point Math 856.53
    CPU - MMX 765.07
    CPU - SSE/3DNow! 260.89
    CPU - Compression 4906.46
    CPU - Encryption 24.28
    CPU - Image Rotation 348.00
    CPU - String Sorting 2963.38
    Graphics 2D - Lines 253.60
    Graphics 2D - Rectangles 565.46
    Graphics 2D - Shapes 63.51
    Graphics 2D - Fonts and Text 451.70
    Graphics 2D - GUI 872.97
    Graphics 3D - Simple 4595.67
    Graphics 3D - Medium 3356.78
    Graphics 3D - Complex 1029.61
    Memory - Allocate Small Block 2505.86
    Memory - Read Cached 969.89
    Memory - Read Uncached 944.14
    Memory - Write 992.76
    Disk - Sequential Read 54.04
    Disk - Sequential Write 41.84
    Disk - Random Seek + RW 3.43
    CD - Read 2.78
    CPU Mark 1123.27
    2D Graphics Mark 509.58
    Memory Mark 527.73
    Disk Mark 262.18
    CD Mark 138.76
    3D Graphics Mark 2994.02
    PassMark Rating 893.82

  • #2
    Better 916.6

    Comment


    • #3
      Handily smokes my Athlon 64 3800+ score of 493.8. I seem to have a couple sub-systems that could use some optimization.

      Have you been able to compare the multi-tasking capability of that dual core to a P4 with hyper-threading? Any comments?

      Comment


      • #4
        If you are running multiple tasks on your PC, dual core is better than hyperthreading.

        With hyperthreading there is still a lot of silicon shared between the two virtual CPUs. Meaning that a lot of the time you aren't getting parallel execution of different threads.

        ----
        David

        Comment

        Working...
        X