First of all, many thanks for an excellent website.
It's become one of the first websites I visit in order to make a purchasing decision.
Since AMD's bulldozer came out, I've been following the scores getting progressively higher. And surprisingly today, I found that the FX 8120 appears to be faster than the flagship FX 8150 AND i7 2600k?![Confused](https://forums.passmark.com/core/images/smilies/confused.png)
This has now cast some doubt in my mind with regards to the accuracy of your charts or the benchmark.
Could you please cast some light on what's going on here, when all other benchmarks out there show the FX 8120 to be inferior to the i7 2600k?
Is it possible overclocking results are also part of the main chart?
Thanks in advance.
It's become one of the first websites I visit in order to make a purchasing decision.
Since AMD's bulldozer came out, I've been following the scores getting progressively higher. And surprisingly today, I found that the FX 8120 appears to be faster than the flagship FX 8150 AND i7 2600k?
![Confused](https://forums.passmark.com/core/images/smilies/confused.png)
This has now cast some doubt in my mind with regards to the accuracy of your charts or the benchmark.
Could you please cast some light on what's going on here, when all other benchmarks out there show the FX 8120 to be inferior to the i7 2600k?
Is it possible overclocking results are also part of the main chart?
Thanks in advance.
Comment