I produced the five tests. The system was the same. The results were very different. I mean the ratio of the maximum result for the minimum.
In the tab "Summary" was:
PassMark Rating 1.71
CPU Mark 1.75
2D Graphics Mark 2.74
3D Graphics Mark 1.62
Memory Mark 3.42
Disk Mark 1.028
In separate tests the spread is even higher:
CPU - Encryption 4.78
Graphics 2D - Complex Vectors 6.18
Memory - Write 10.02
Only for disc test ratio max / min was stable.
The worst in terms of the parameters of the spread following section:
Disk - Sequential Write 1.096
My computer is old, but BurnIn test is successful.
No errors.
How to interpret these results?
What ratio of the maximum to the minimum of the results should show your program to a known-good computer?
Sorry for my English.
In the tab "Summary" was:
PassMark Rating 1.71
CPU Mark 1.75
2D Graphics Mark 2.74
3D Graphics Mark 1.62
Memory Mark 3.42
Disk Mark 1.028
In separate tests the spread is even higher:
CPU - Encryption 4.78
Graphics 2D - Complex Vectors 6.18
Memory - Write 10.02
Only for disc test ratio max / min was stable.
The worst in terms of the parameters of the spread following section:
Disk - Sequential Write 1.096
My computer is old, but BurnIn test is successful.
No errors.
How to interpret these results?
What ratio of the maximum to the minimum of the results should show your program to a known-good computer?
Sorry for my English.
Comment