I am setting up for production testing with the latest release of BurninTest Linux (v5.0 (1003) at this time)
Hardware:
Motherboard/SBC: ASRock SBC250J (BIOS limits CPU package power to 6.5W)
RAM: 8-GB InnoDisk M450-8GS1NCEM
Disk: TS128GBTE670 128-GB NVMe drive
Operating System:
RHEL 8.2 with kernel 6.1.11-1.el8.elrepo.x86_64 (required to support the Intel 2.5G Ethernet Controllers)
In porting from using v4.1 I noted that v5.0 is guaranteed to throw an error is the NVMe drive and RAM tests are selected. It doesn't matter if the command-line version is used or the gui version.
It didn't matter if swap was enabled or disabled.
It didn't matter if testing a new partition only or the default startup disk.
I can run for days with CPU, 2D Graphics and Network selected with either RAM or Disk; but not both. I was able to run all tests with V4.1 for days-on-end with no issue.
I tested using 50% on all tests down to 1% for disk.This only pushes out the inevitable BUG of failing on a test that is flagged as INFORMATION; not CRTICAL or SERIOUS.
The BITErrorClassification.txt file being used is the unmodified version supplied with the latest version download. This has error 259 set to INFORMATION.I'm reluctant to modify this document because it appears to use both UNICODE and single-byte input.
I can create a debug.log later on with removal of the license key data.
Thank you,
Josiah Standing
Comark
Hardware:
Motherboard/SBC: ASRock SBC250J (BIOS limits CPU package power to 6.5W)
RAM: 8-GB InnoDisk M450-8GS1NCEM
Disk: TS128GBTE670 128-GB NVMe drive
Operating System:
RHEL 8.2 with kernel 6.1.11-1.el8.elrepo.x86_64 (required to support the Intel 2.5G Ethernet Controllers)
In porting from using v4.1 I noted that v5.0 is guaranteed to throw an error is the NVMe drive and RAM tests are selected. It doesn't matter if the command-line version is used or the gui version.
It didn't matter if swap was enabled or disabled.
It didn't matter if testing a new partition only or the default startup disk.
I can run for days with CPU, 2D Graphics and Network selected with either RAM or Disk; but not both. I was able to run all tests with V4.1 for days-on-end with no issue.
I tested using 50% on all tests down to 1% for disk.This only pushes out the inevitable BUG of failing on a test that is flagged as INFORMATION; not CRTICAL or SERIOUS.
The BITErrorClassification.txt file being used is the unmodified version supplied with the latest version download. This has error 259 set to INFORMATION.I'm reluctant to modify this document because it appears to use both UNICODE and single-byte input.
I can create a debug.log later on with removal of the license key data.
Thank you,
Josiah Standing
Comark
Comment