Values for "Expected" and "Actual" are swapped during test 6

[hackasynthetic]

Hi. It seems to me, unless I'm wrong, that the values shown when errors are displayed, during test 6, are swapped for Expected and Actual.
See this screenshot:

The Pattern and Actual both have 1 bit set(and it seems like test 6's Pattern always consists of just 1 bit set), but Expected has 2 bits set. It seems like the Pattern and Expected should be the ones having the 1 bit set. Thus I concluded that Actual and Expected are swapped. If I didn't misunderstand something, how soon would you fix this?

Thanks.

[hackasynthetic]

Look I've more screens, hope this helps

[hackasynthetic]

just one more ^

[keith]

Test 6 [Block move, 64 moves]
...
Memory is initialized with shifting patterns that are inverted every 8 bytes. Then 4mb blocks of memory are moved around using the movsl instruction. After the moves are completed the data patterns are checked. Because the data is checked only after the memory moves are completed it is not possible to know where the error occurred. The addresses reported are only for where the bad pattern was found. Since the moves are constrained to a 8mb segment of memory the failing address will always be less than 8mb away from the reported address.
...

Unlike other tests, Expected values in Test 6 Block Move have a different meaning because it isn't a comparison check for a certain pattern; Rather it is a comparison between values in adjacent addresses to see if it matches. If there is a mismatch, the value in address p is shown as the Actual value, while p + 1 is shown as the Expected value.

It is a bit misleading because the indicated address may not be the actual failing address, as described in the test description above.

[hackasynthetic]

Unlike other tests, Expected values in Test 6 Block Move have a different meaning because it isn't a comparison check for a certain pattern; Rather it is a comparison between values in adjacent addresses to see if it matches. If there is a mismatch, the value in address p is shown as the Actual value, while p + 1 is shown as the Expected value.

It is a bit misleading because the indicated address may not be the actual failing address, as described in the test description above.

Sounds like Expected should be the value in address p, and Actual should be the value in address p+1. I mean, why is it the other way around? )