I've read a bit about this discrepancy between 3D and 2D performance having to do with microsoft updates. Still, what would explain my GPU running with such a low 2D score (274), lower than many cheaper graphics cards, while giving a 3D score (7112) that is perfectly healthy? Is there any way to solve this? Could this indicate some kind of defect in the card?
I notice most of the 2D tests were only taking up a quarter of the screen. This laptop has a 4k display, could it be a resolution issue?
Thanks
I notice most of the 2D tests were only taking up a quarter of the screen. This laptop has a 4k display, could it be a resolution issue?
Thanks
Comment