If I am posting this is the wrong area, please move my post to the correct area and then notify me.
Passmark's CPU benchmark page seems to be the ONLY currently updated page that offers speed comparisons between most of the latest processors. (but not all of them)
I have only a few requests to make the page more useful to tech types who are using these numbers to compare models of desktops, notebooks, and servers based on CPU performance since the jumble of processor numbers from Intel and AMD these days practically amounts to gibberish with no real meaning to use to compare processors.
First and foremost, why isn't there a processor search box right there on the http://www.cpubenchmark.net/ site so I can type in a processor name and have the appropriate chart come up with my processor highlighted. There seems to be a way to do it inadvertantly, but it's not a simple search box as one would expect. The Processor list is about as close as it comes but it's not quite as intuitive since you have to scroll down through the list trying to figure out the sort order.
Could you differentiate which of these benchmarks were performed by passmark and which of these benchmarks were user submitted. It is clear that some lesser processors show better scores than processors of the same class that are clocked higher, so I'd like to give more weight to the professional unbiased test results I'd expect from the passmark team.
Could you please try to make sure that all processor models still available from at least the last 3-5 years are listed somewhere in your charts since generally these are the processors in bargain and midrange systems. I found that several processor models of each class are missing even on current 2Ghz + models.
Could you label & highlight Overclocked systems so that it is clear that they are not "stock" CPU benchmarks.
Could you clearly differentiate when multiple processors(sockets) are being used and when multiple core CPU's are being tested. Right now the nomenclature being used is confusing. I assume you only have the ability to test the system as a whole and not test athe performance of a single processor or single core if more are in the system. ( I have systems available to me from 1 to 4 sockets with single to quad-core processors, and may soon be getting an 8 socket server).
Could you provide more information about each processor test listed if a person were to doubleclick (or hover) over the listed processor ? Especially details such as system model, chipset, RAM speed, etc.... I have a wide range of Hp servers to test and would like to be able to see comparable information from others.
Lastly, Do you have any downloadable software or a web page that would just run the CPUmark test so that purchasing the software would not be required to benchmark your system for submittal to passmark for the www.cpubenchmark.net site ? I would love to benchmark some of my servers for submittal, but can't justify the expenditure for each server I am willing to test. I just wanted to add to the cpubenchmarks.net results to that they are more complete.
Passmark's CPU benchmark page seems to be the ONLY currently updated page that offers speed comparisons between most of the latest processors. (but not all of them)
I have only a few requests to make the page more useful to tech types who are using these numbers to compare models of desktops, notebooks, and servers based on CPU performance since the jumble of processor numbers from Intel and AMD these days practically amounts to gibberish with no real meaning to use to compare processors.
First and foremost, why isn't there a processor search box right there on the http://www.cpubenchmark.net/ site so I can type in a processor name and have the appropriate chart come up with my processor highlighted. There seems to be a way to do it inadvertantly, but it's not a simple search box as one would expect. The Processor list is about as close as it comes but it's not quite as intuitive since you have to scroll down through the list trying to figure out the sort order.
Could you differentiate which of these benchmarks were performed by passmark and which of these benchmarks were user submitted. It is clear that some lesser processors show better scores than processors of the same class that are clocked higher, so I'd like to give more weight to the professional unbiased test results I'd expect from the passmark team.
Could you please try to make sure that all processor models still available from at least the last 3-5 years are listed somewhere in your charts since generally these are the processors in bargain and midrange systems. I found that several processor models of each class are missing even on current 2Ghz + models.
Could you label & highlight Overclocked systems so that it is clear that they are not "stock" CPU benchmarks.
Could you clearly differentiate when multiple processors(sockets) are being used and when multiple core CPU's are being tested. Right now the nomenclature being used is confusing. I assume you only have the ability to test the system as a whole and not test athe performance of a single processor or single core if more are in the system. ( I have systems available to me from 1 to 4 sockets with single to quad-core processors, and may soon be getting an 8 socket server).
Could you provide more information about each processor test listed if a person were to doubleclick (or hover) over the listed processor ? Especially details such as system model, chipset, RAM speed, etc.... I have a wide range of Hp servers to test and would like to be able to see comparable information from others.
Lastly, Do you have any downloadable software or a web page that would just run the CPUmark test so that purchasing the software would not be required to benchmark your system for submittal to passmark for the www.cpubenchmark.net site ? I would love to benchmark some of my servers for submittal, but can't justify the expenditure for each server I am willing to test. I just wanted to add to the cpubenchmarks.net results to that they are more complete.
Comment